The Controversial Linear No-Threshold Model
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Linear No-Threshold Model VS. Radiation Hormesis.
The atomic bomb survivor cancer mortality data have been used in the past to justify the use of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model for estimating the carcinogenic effects of low dose radiation. An analysis of the recently updated atomic bomb survivor cancer mortality dose-response data shows that the data no longer support the LNT model but are consistent with a radiation hormesis model when a...
متن کاملConsistency of The Mortality of Chronically-irradiated Beagles with the Linear No-Threshold Model
This note explores whether the lowest dose-rate mortality data from the beagle tissue archive might be consistent with the Linear No-Threshold (LNT) Model and might give evidence in favour of that model. I suggest that the answer may be ‘yes’; further statistical analysis will be required to establish how strongly the data favour LNT over alternative non-linear models. 1 The mortality data A pa...
متن کاملDestroying the Linear No-threshold Basis for Radiation Regulation
This article suggests five classes of effort that scientists can undertake to destroy the linear no-threshold hypothesis as the basis of radiation regulation in the United States. These are (1) pressure on regulators such as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, (2) presidential messages, (3) Congressional pressure, (4) educate physicians about low-dose radiation, and (5) work with journalists and...
متن کاملTest of the linear-no threshold theory: rationale for procedures.
A tightly reasoned justification is presented for the procedures used in our test of the linear-no threshold theory of radiation carcinogenesis by comparing lung cancer rates with average radon exposure in U.S. counties. A key point is its dependence on ecological variables rather than on characteristics of individuals and the principal problems involve treatment of potential confounding factor...
متن کاملA Failed Ontology: The Linear No-threshold Model of Radiogenic Cancer
A debate within radiation protection science has been building over many years regarding whether low-dose, ionizing radiation (LDIR, in the range of 0 200 mGy) is known to be a carcinogen (1). That debate now approaches a fever pitch, and the time is ripe to assess what is known and how it is known to determine where truth must lie. A philosophy developed over centuries that applies to such an ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Nuclear Medicine
سال: 2016
ISSN: 0161-5505,2159-662X
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.182667